Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Moto G60s, having an 80 score against 79.9. Google Pixel 3's design is way lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G60s. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a little better performance than Moto G60s. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better display than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. The Moto G60s takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60s also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The Motorola Moto G60s has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Moto G60s counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.