Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-02-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is slightly better than the Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 global score. Although the Google Pixel 3 and Moto G7 Plus were only released 4 months apart, the Google Pixel 3 is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G7 Plus takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a back camera with a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Moto G7 Plus features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G7 Plus also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.