Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a little bit better than the Moto G8 Power's 76 global score. The Google Pixel 3 construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than Moto G8 Power, despite of the fact that it was released only 18 months before. The Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount per display inch.
The Moto G8 Power has a superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G8 Power also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processor than Moto G8 Power. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G8 Power shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.