Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than Moto G9 Power's 78.6 score. Google Pixel 3's body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Power, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a way greater display pixel density.
The Moto G9 Power counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Power. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Moto G9 Power has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Moto G9 Power also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and higher video frame rate. The Moto G9 Power counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 106% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.