Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Moto Z Force, having a general score of 80 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is much newer and a bit lighter, but just a little bit thicker than Moto Z Force. Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size display, the Moto Z Force also has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Moto Z Force also has a much higher 21 MP resolution camera. Moto Z Force features better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.