Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a overall score of 80 against 77.4. Although Google Pixel 3 is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's a lot thicker and just a little heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a processor that's just as good as Google Pixel 3's processing unit, both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a little more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 3 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Google Pixel 3 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.