Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 84.6 against 80. Even though the Motorola One 5G is newer than Google Pixel 3, it's somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola One 5G captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.