Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3, having a general score of 81.6 against 80. The Motorola One 5G Ace construction is newer than the Google Pixel 3's, but it is heavier and a lot thicker. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent more battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.