Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Action's overall score of 78.5. The Google Pixel 3 design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action, despite of the fact that it was released only 10 months before. Google Pixel 3 has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch of display. Motorola One Action counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 3 takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 3 also has a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The Motorola One Action counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.