Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, with an 80 score against 79.8. The Google Pixel 3 body is much lighter and thinner than Motorola One Hyper, even though it was released just 14 months before. The Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Motorola One Hyper has much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.