Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a score of 80.7 against 80. The Motorola One Vision construction is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Motorola One Vision. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite better display density. Motorola One Vision counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Vision captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Motorola One Vision has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.