Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Motorola One Zoom is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 3, but it is thicker and a lot heavier. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel count per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Zoom has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola One Zoom has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2915mAh. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a larger aperture and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.