Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 87 against 80. The Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Google Pixel 3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 2915mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.