Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, having an 80.5 score against 80. Nokia 8.3 5G's construction is newer, but thicker and notably heavier than the Google Pixel 3. The Nokia 8.3 5G features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Nokia 8.3 5G features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back camera.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia 8.3 5G has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% larger battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.