Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with an 80.8 score against 80. The Nokia XR20 body is newer, but much thicker and heavier than Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Nokia XR20 has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Nokia XR20 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos, higher video frame rates and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Nokia XR20 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia XR20 has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.