Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 80 score against 75.8. The Google Pixel 3 construction is thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released about a year before. Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.