Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. The Google Pixel 3 is an older device than nubia Red Magic 5S, but Google managed to make it way lighter and thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger display. Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot more mega pixels camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.