Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2, having a overall score of 80 against 79.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a notably lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but both of them are equally thin. The OPPO Find X2 has a much better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a larger display, a little bit greater pixel number per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and better video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.