Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 global score. Google Pixel 3's design is lighter than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it's a little thicker and was released a bit more more than a year before. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger sensor, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 38 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.