Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3, getting a global score of 83.1 against 80. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, although it is thicker and a lot heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a quite better display pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4260mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.