Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a score of 80 against 77. The Google Pixel 3 design is lighter but a little thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture and a camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 features a much better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.