Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is extremely older than the Galaxy A15 5G, it's body is a bit thinner and extremely lighter. The Galaxy A15 5G has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 3 features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A15 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy A15 5G features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.