Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A22's 76.1 score. The Google Pixel 3 body is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy A22, even though it was released many years before. Google Pixel 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 3 features a sharper display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a way greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A22. The Google Pixel 3 takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.