Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 84.6 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's design is extremely newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.