Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's global score of 79.9. Even though Google Pixel 3 is much older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is just a little bit thinner and notably lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a really superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.