Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Galaxy A30s, getting an 80 score against 79.8. Google Pixel 3 is an older and just a little thicker device than Galaxy A30s, but Google managed to make it lighter anyway. Google Pixel 3 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Galaxy A30s features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A30s. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
Galaxy A30s features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% bigger battery size. Google Pixel 3 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations and a much less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.