Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a global score of 80 against 79.4. Google Pixel 3 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Google managed to make it a bit thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Galaxy A35 5G has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a lot larger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.