Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. The Galaxy A41 is a a bit heavier phone than Google Pixel 3, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A41 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A41 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A41. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A41 features better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.