Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, with an 86.6 score against 80. Galaxy A50s is a newer and just a little bit thinner device than Google Pixel 3, but it's somewhat heavier. Galaxy A50s's processor is very similar to Google Pixel 3's CPU, and although the Galaxy A50s has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little better display density. Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.