Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than Google Pixel 3, having a score of 90.8 against 80. Galaxy A51 5G is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 3, but it's a lot heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much more MP camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.