Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a 90.7 score against 80. The Galaxy A52 body is extremely newer than Google Pixel 3's, although it's extremely heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.