Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than Google Pixel 3's score of 80. Galaxy A52s's body is much newer than Google Pixel 3's, although it's just a little thicker and a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a processing unit that's just as good as the CPU in Google Pixel 3, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A52s has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.