Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 3 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is noticeably lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a way less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has greater battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3600mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.