Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, having an 80 score against 76.9. The Google Pixel 3 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A70, but it is lighter. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54 percent larger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.