Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. The Samsung Galaxy A71 body is newer and a bit thinner than Google Pixel 3's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A71, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A71 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A71 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 also has a lot more MP back camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.