Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Google Pixel 3, having a 92.9 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, but it is a lot heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.