Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7's 77.7 general score. Google Pixel 3's design is extremely newer and lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C7. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy C7. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a much better video quality. Galaxy C7 counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.