Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, having a global score of 80 against 78.4. Google Pixel 3 is a newer and lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy C7 Pro features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C7 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.