Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Samsung Galaxy F23's construction is a lot newer and lighter than Google Pixel 3's, but it is also just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy F23. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher display density. Galaxy F23 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy F23 has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent larger battery size. The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a lot lower resolution back camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.