Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than Google Pixel 3's overall score of 80. Galaxy F62's design is extremely newer than the Google Pixel 3's, although it is way heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 140 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.