Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Google Pixel 3's 80 general score. Galaxy Fold's body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel 3's, but it's also heavier. Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density. Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lesser mega-pixels camera in the back, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Galaxy Fold also counts with a larger aperture. The Galaxy Fold has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.