Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, having an 80 score against 76.1. The Google Pixel 3 is a newer phone, and it's also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max. The Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy J7 Max has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy J7 Max. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 3 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.