Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than Galaxy M20's overall score of 78.9. Google Pixel 3's construction is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy M20, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M20. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3 captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs. The Galaxy M20 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.