Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has a global score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's overall score of 80. Galaxy M30 is a heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy M30 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Galaxy M30, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.