Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with an 87.7 score against 80. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it is thicker and noticeably heavier. Google Pixel 3 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy M51 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 140 percent more battery size. Galaxy M51 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M51 also has a way larger camera sensor and a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.