Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Google Pixel 3, getting a global score of 90.8 against 80. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is newer than Google Pixel 3, it is just a little thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot higher video quality and a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 48 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.