Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3, but both of them are equally thin. The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bit larger display, a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images in low light situations and a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a back camera with more MP.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.