Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Google Pixel 3, having an 89 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3, but they are equally thin. The Google Pixel 3 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note10 has a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Note10 counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 20% greater battery size. The Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.