Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it's a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.