Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note3, getting a general score of 80 against 77.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy Note3. Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels number per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a larger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy Note3 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note3 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.